Title IX cases

	Reason: members of club lacrosse and club softball argue that the womens teams did not get as many athletic opportunities as the mens did nor as much fundigng result: Based on the evidence presented by the school, the court said it met the second criterion for complying with Title IX, a sufficient history of expanding opportunities for women athletes. It also noted the existence of formal policies to allow students to bring their interests and abilities to the school's attention.
	Reason: Brown was planning to cut two mens sports and two womens sports to reduce costs. The women felt that it was unfair because womens sports were most recently added and there werent as many of them Result:Found that Brown University was in violation of Title IX provisions when it demoted certain womens teams from university-funded to donor-funded. Case was appealed to the Supreme Court in 1997. the court added the gymnastics and volleyball teams back
	...
	...
	...
	...
	...
	...