Rhetorical Terms for Midterm
Terms : Hide Images [1]
Any repetitition of grammatical structures, phrases or clauses | ||
A form of parallelism that contrasts opposites | ||
A type of parallelism with three parallel phrases or clauses. Also known as the rule of three | ||
The repetition of the same word at the beginning of repeated sentences or clauses | ||
A question to which the speaker and audience already knwo the answer | ||
Indirect reference to Biblical, literary, historical, or mythological figures, events, or stories | ||
Repetition of the initial consonant sounds beginnings veral words in sequence | ||
Repetition of the same vowel sounds in words close to each other | ||
Rhetorical repetition of one or several words. specifically, repetition of a word that ends one clause at the beginning of the next | ||
Repetition of the same word or phrase at the end of succesive clauses | ||
Expression of doubt by which a speaker appears uncertain as to what she should think, say, or do | ||
A turn from the general audience to address a specific group or person or personficied abstraction absent or present | ||
Lack of conjunctions between coordinate phrases, clauses, or words | ||
Harsh joining of sounds | ||
A harsh metaphor involving the use of a word beyond its strict sphere | ||
Two corresponding pairs arranged not in parallels but in inverted order | ||
Arrangement of words, phrases, or clauses in anorder of ascending power | ||
Substitution of an agreeable or at least a non-offensive expression for one whose plainer meaning might be harsh or unpleasant | ||
Exaggeration for emphasis or for rhetorical effect | ||
Expression of something which is contrary to the intended meaning, the words say one thing but mean another | ||
Implied comparison | ||
Repetition of an idea in a different word, phrase, or sentence | ||
Apparent paradox achieved by the juxtaposition of words which seem to contradict one another | ||
An assertion seemingly opposed to sommon sense, but that may have some truth | ||
Attribution of personality to an impersonal thing | ||
Uss of superficious or redundant words, often enriching thought | ||
An explicit comparison between two things using like or as | ||
Use of a word with two others, with each of which is understood differently |