CourseNotes
Published on CourseNotes (https://course-notes.org)

Home > AP US Gov and Politics > Case Briefs > Goldberg v. Kelly

Goldberg v. Kelly

1. Goldberg v. Kelly, (1970)

2. Facts: A welfare recipient’s benefits were terminated without an evidentiary hearing.

3. Issue: Whether 14th amendment procedural due process required that a welfare recipient be afforded “an evidentiary hearing before the termination of benefits.”

4. Holding: Yes.

5. Majority Reasoning: [Brennan] Welfare benefits are a matter of statutory entitlement. They are not mere charity but a means to promote the general welfare. Thus, termination of benefits without a hearing may deprive an eligible recipient of his “liberty” and “property”.

6. Notes: In Bell v. Burson, a driver’s license was held to be an entitlement under state law, and so a state could not suspend a driver’s license without a hearing to determine fault in an accident.

Subject: 
US Gov and Politics [1]
Subject X2: 
US Gov and Politics [1]

Source URL:https://course-notes.org/us_gov_and_politics/case_briefs/goldberg_v_kelly#comment-0

Links
[1] https://course-notes.org/subject/us_gov_and_politics