Chapter 21
The Muslim Empires
- I. Introduction
- A. Muslim world essentially destroyed by those pesky Mongols
- B. But then…out of nowhere…came the return of the Muslims
- 1. Ottoman Empire – the biggest
- 2. Safavid Empire – Afghanistan and Iran
- 3. Mughal – the northern part of India
- C. These “gunpowder empires” could be compared with Russia and the West
- 1. In fact…they probably will be on a test not far, far away
- a. All militarily important
- b. Interacted far less with west than Russia
- c. Maintained control over how much they wanted to deal w/ West
- 1. In fact…they probably will be on a test not far, far away
- II. The Ottomans: From Frontier Warriors to Empire Builders
- A. Introduction
- 1. Turkic-speaking peoples
- a. Some fleeing Mongols, some looking for booty
- b. Osman leads one of these peoples – the Ottomans
- 2. Ottomans attack Byzantine Empire
- a. Finally Mehmed II defeats Constantinople
- b. Big bad guns too much for big bad walls
- 3. Extending the Ottoman Empire
- a. Scary naval power in Mediterranean
- b. Spread empire down to Egypt and across N. Africa
- 1. Looks kind of like what the Roman Empire looked like, w/out Europe
- c. Threatened Vienna, but didn’t take
- d. But…Europe afraid of Ottomans for centuries…always in back of mind
- 1. Near the hypothalamus area
- 1. Turkic-speaking peoples
- B. A State Geared to Warfare
- 1. Economy and social class based on warfare
- a. Warrior class goes to top…surprise…guess who got to make the rules
- b. Competed for power with religious leaders and administrators
- 2. Army of Janissaries
- a. aka “Really Good Christian Slave Soldiers that Fight For Us”
- 1. Some given by parents, some taken forcibly
- 2. Schooled and could become bureaucrats
- 3. Hey…this is another type of coerced labor…interesting
- b. Became more powerful than cavalry – threatened aristocracy
- 1. What’s scarier…Mr. Ed the Horse or a canon and gun?
- a. aka “Really Good Christian Slave Soldiers that Fight For Us”
- 1. Economy and social class based on warfare
- C. The Sultans and Their Court
- 1. Sultans control those beneath and economy
- a. Manipulated factions – aristocracy, religious, administrators
- b. Commerce given to Christians/Jews – “people of the book”
- 2. Sultans grow distant from the masses
- a. This will surprise you, but…sultans got richer
- b. Spent all their days blowing money on wives, rituals and palaces
- c. Viziers ended up taking control – think Prime Minister
- 3. Problems with succession
- a. Like the rest of the Muslim world (similarity), succession confusing
- b. When you have a harem, you have many sons
- 1. You die…they fight each other
- 2. Losing sons sometimes fled to enemy nations to stage revolt
- 1. Sultans control those beneath and economy
- D. Constantinople Restored and the Flowering of Ottoman Culture
- 1. Changing Constantinople
- a. After destroyed/sacked – rebuilt
- b. Hagia Sophia converted from cathedral to mosque
- c. Aqueducts built, markets reopened, city’s walls repaired
- 2. Future sultans try to improve mosques, infrastructure
- a. Architecture blends best of Muslim/Byzantine world
- a. Mansions, rest houses, schools, hospitals, gardens
- b. Fun and exciting markets
- c. Coffeehouses became centers of socialization, literary sharing and ingesting of caffeinated beverages
- a. Architecture blends best of Muslim/Byzantine world
- 3. Regulation of merchants and artisans
- a. Government inspectors monitored quality of goods/artisans
- b. Artisans joined together in guilds – that sounds just like Europe
- 4. Language shift to Turkish
- a. Ummm…they shifted language to Turkish – literature and official business
- 1. Changing Constantinople
- E. The Problem of Ottoman Decline
- 1. Different perspectives of Ottoman Empire
- a. Some talk about how bad decline was
- b. Eventually became “sick man” of Europe
- 2. Long decline means actually quite strong
- a. How many other empires have are around for 600 years
- 1. US has been an empire for about 61 years…but we’ve been declining for 28 months
- b. By 17th century, they started retreat from Russia, Europe, Arab lands
- c. Too large to be maintained – gave regional autonomy
- a. How many other empires have are around for 600 years
- 3. Breakdown of regional administration
- a. Officials became corrupt
- 1. Locals leaders hold back money from incompetent nincompoops
- 2. Some rebellions at the local level
- a. Officials became corrupt
- 4. Problems of imperial administration
- a. Future leaders not groomed, but hidden away for protection
- 1. Monarchs kept alive, but fairly unprepared/naïve
- b. Leaders no longer fierce military leaders, but pampered
- c. Power of military started to fade
- a. Future leaders not groomed, but hidden away for protection
- 2. Long decline means actually quite strong
- 1. Different perspectives of Ottoman Empire
- F. Military Reverses and the Ottoman Retreat
- 1. Ottomans fall further behind Europeans
- a. Reliance on super huge cannons
- b. Janissaries don’t want military change that threatens their position
- 1. Sounds a bit like the samurai…oohh…another connection
- 2. Muslim sea power ends in 16th century
- a. Battle of Lepanto – Spanish/Venetians wipe them out
- b. Fleet rebuilt, but damage done
- 1. Portuguese have head start on Africa
- 2. Spanish/Venetians control Eastern Mediterranean
- 3. Empire changes around world affect Ottoman finances
- a. Christian European rivals get rich off of new goods
- b. Tax collectors/merchants no longer making money
- 1. No need to go through Ottoman Empire
- c. Tons of bullion (aka silver) enters market
- 1. Too much bullion equals high inflation
- 4. Refusal to accept European ideas dooms empire
- a. Falling behind in scientific, technological, commercial transformations
- b. Also…in trade and warfare
- 1. Arab world believed Europe has nothing to offer
- a. Ohhh…poor naïve little fellas
- 2. Conservative religious groups – nothing new
- a. Want to protect position – remember Janissaries
- 1. Arab world believed Europe has nothing to offer
- 1. Ottomans fall further behind Europeans
- A. Introduction
- III. The Shi’a Challenge of the Safavids
- A. Introduction
- 1. History of Shi’a/Sunni Conflict
- a. Like Ottomans
- 1. Rose from Turkic nomadic struggles
- 2. Also represent militant Islam
- b. However…they are Shi’a – Ali and Muhammad’s ancestors should rule
- c. Battle between Safavid Shi’a and Ottoman Sunni still lasts today
- 2. Origins of empire
- a. Started with Sufi mystic Sail al-Din wanted to purify/reform Islam
- 1. This led to a lot of enemies
- b. Eventually Isma’il took Tabriz and became emperor
- a. Started with Sufi mystic Sail al-Din wanted to purify/reform Islam
- 3. Battle of Chaldiran
- a. N. West Persia – Shi’a vs. Sunni – battle for everything
- 1. This would be like if the Catholics and Protestants had one big battle to decide who will rule all of Europe
- b. Isma’il’s cavalry destroyed by Ottoman firepower
- a. N. West Persia – Shi’a vs. Sunni – battle for everything
- 4. Significance of Chaldiran
- a. Ottoman’s couldn’t maintain empire
- b. Safavid empire can’t move further west
- c. Spread of Shi’a Islam doesn’t go further west
- 1. Shi’a mostly Iran and part of Southern Iraq
- a. Yes…there are problems today because of that
- 1. Shi’a mostly Iran and part of Southern Iraq
- 2. Origins of empire
- a. Like Ottomans
- 1. History of Shi’a/Sunni Conflict
- B. Politics and War Under the Safavid Shahs
- 1. Years of turmoil
- a. Isma’il depressed due to loss, started years of turmoil
- b. Relative piece/height of empire – 1587-1629
- 2. Attempts to bring Turkish chiefs under control
- a. Given warrior nobility status – like Ottomans
- 1. They would threaten Shah for power
- b. Turkic nobles balanced by appointed Persians
- c. Plus…army of slave boys brought in to be administrators
- 1. Yep…kind of like Janissaries
- a. And yep…they were part of power struggle
- 1. Yep…kind of like Janissaries
- a. Given warrior nobility status – like Ottomans
- 3. Using outsiders as advisors and warriors
- a. These “slave regiments controlled firearms
- b. Not reluctant to use technological info from Europeans
- 1. Learned about casting of cannons and slave infantry from England
- 2. Armed 40,000 troops…attempt to secure domain
- 1. Years of turmoil
- C. State and Religion
- 1. Relation to Persia
- a. Persian replaces Turkish as spoken language
- b. Opulent palaces
- c. Grand titles – padishah – king of kings
- d. claimed descent from Shi’a imams – successors of Ali
- 2. Full theocracy
- a. Shi’a becomes dominant sect taught
- b. Mullahs – religious/prayer leaders supervised by state
- 1. Taught must curse first three caliphs
- 2. Teaching in mosque schools regulated by government
- 3. Forced conversions to Shi’ism
- a. Iranian identity – Shi’ism
- b. Forced Jews, Sunnis, Sufi, Christians, Zoraster
- c. Shi’a Religious festivals
- 1. Public flagellation
- 2. Passion plays
- 3. Pilgrimages to shrine – Karbala in Iraq
- 1. Relation to Persia
- D. Elite Affluence and Artistic Splendor
- 1. Restoring mosques and improving infrastructure
- a. 17th century - Abbas I safe roads with rest stops
- b. Merchants trade with China/India and Europeans
- c. Ishafan mosques proved glory
- 1. geometric shapes, floral patterns, verses from Qur’an
- 2. Oasis of arches, greenery, colorful designs contrasted land
- 1. Restoring mosques and improving infrastructure
- E. Society and Gender Roles
- 1. Similar social issues between Ottomans and Safavids
- a. Both led by warrior aristocracy
- b. Retreated to estates – put huge financial drain on peasants
- c. Peasants hurt by foreign invasions, civil strife, breakdown of services
- 2. Role of handicraft
- a. Both encouraged handicraft/trade
- b. Both encouraged workshops for miniature paintings, rugs
- c. Both paid engineers well
- d. Both encouraged trade
- 1. Ottomans had advantage – Jews/Christians already trading Europe
- 3. Role of women – negative
- a. Women subordinated to fathers/husbands – surprise/surprise
- b. Women kept secluded/veiled – always more strict in cities
- 4. Role of women – positive
- a. Some women fought restrictions
- 1. Colorful robes, refused to be veiled
- c. Protected inheritance laws – divorce possible
b. Wives/concubines influenced rulers
- a. Some women fought restrictions
- 1. Similar social issues between Ottomans and Safavids
- 5. Overall status of women
- a. Some lived better than India/China
- b.Most lived llife with limited contact and had to stay in house
- A. Introduction
- F. The Rapid Demise of the Safavid Empire
- 1. Causes of Decline
- a. Leaders kept in seclusion – become inept
- b. Eventually beat by nomads in 1722
- c. Become battleground for nomads/neighbors wanting to take over
- 1. Causes of Decline
- A. Introduction
- 1. Founding of the Mughal Empire
- a. Babur – said he was related to Mongols, but mostly Turkish
- b. Lost his kingdom in central Asia – Afghanistan
- c. Pushed around in Afghanistan – at 16
- 2. Babur takes over Northern India
- a. Can’t reclaim homeland, settles for ugly green subcontinent
- b. Beat Indians rather easily – 12,000 vs. 100,000 Lodi
- 1. Superior firepower
- 2. Scared the elephants, trampled Indians
- 3. Lodi’s men hated him, had no problem changing sides
- c. Babur pretty impressive guy
- 1. Wrote history
- 2. Fine musician, landscaper – gardens for capital
- 3. But…didn’t administer…kept old Mongol system in place
- 3. After Babur’s death a fight for power
- a. Humayan – son inherits kingdom – 18
- b. Pushed out and lives with Safavids for awhile
- c. Returns fights, back, then dies falling down stairs while carrying books
- 1. Founding of the Mughal Empire
- B. Akbar and the Basis for a Lasting Empire
- 1. Successes of Akbar
- a. Though only 13, pretty impressive – fought back rivals
- b. Long rule, about the same time as Elizabeth
- 2. Military conquest and social/economic changes
- a. Realized need to administer properly
- b. Brilliant, illiterate – but great memory, slept 3 hours a night
- 3. Long term religious plan
- a. Reconciliation and cooperation with Hindu princes
- 1. Encouraged intermarriage
- 2. Abolished head tax - jizya
- 3. Promoted Hindus to highest ranks
- 4. Muslims must respect cows
- b. Tried to invent new religion – Din-I-Ilahi
- 1. Would forever end conflict in India
- a. Reconciliation and cooperation with Hindu princes
- 4. Connection between aristocrats and monarchy
- a. Military made nobility, but had to be prepared to fight
- b. Local leaders had relative autonomy
- 1. Successes of Akbar
- C. Social Reform and Social Change
- 1. Attempts to alter daily life
- a. Improve calendar
- b. Living quarters for the poor
- c. Regulate consumption of alcohol – son 20 cups of wine a day
- 2. Attempts to improve role of women
- a. Encouraged widow remarriage
- b. Discouraged child marriages
- c. Legally prohibited sati
- 1. Even though it went against warrior class
- d. Relief for women trapped in purdah
- 1. Attempts to alter daily life
- D. Mughal Splendor and Early European Contacts
- 1. Initial European reaction to Indian cities
- a. Cities of Delhi, Agra, Lahore impressive
- b. Armies dwarfed European armies
- c. but…huge poverty and soldiers aren’t trained
- 2. Trade with Europe
- a. Trade gap – no interest in European products, but huge for textiles
- 3. Demand for Indian textiles
- a. Cloth fine…wondered in Europe – daughter see through – 3 layers
- b. Techniques of weaving and dying – madras, muslin, pajamas
- 1. Initial European reaction to Indian cities
- E. Artistic Achievement in the Mughal Era
- 1. Rulers start living the good life
- 2. Jahangir and Shah Jahan patrons of the arts
- 3. Mughal Architecture
- F. Court Politics and the Position of Elite and Ordinary Women
- 1. Elite women gain power in politics
- 2. Role of women in rest of society declined
- G. The Beginnings of Imperial Decline
- 1. Domestic problems
- 2. Two ambitions of Aurangzeb
- 3. Military conflict drains treasury
- 4. Attempts to rid India of Hindu influence
- 5. Threats from new groups
- A. Failure to utilize European technology
- B. Failure to match European overseas expansion
- C. Attempts of Muslim empires to hold their own
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Chapter 21 The Muslim Empires | 50 KB |