Chapter 11
The Americas on the Eve of Invasion
- Introduction
- By 1500, Americas densely populated by Indians – misnomer – Columbus/Indies
- Term has meaning only when used to apply to non-Indians
- Mesoamerica and Andean heartland
- Imperial states in place when Europe arrives
- Few areas influenced by two main centers
- Areas that developed independently
- By 1500, Americas densely populated by Indians – misnomer – Columbus/Indies
- Postclassic Mesoamerica
- Introduction
- Toltecs/Aztecs replace Mayas of 8th century CE
- By 15th century Aztecs created extensive empire – war, religion, agrarian
- Downfall of Mayans – Teotihuacan
- Nomads from North come down
- Toltec Culture – 968 established capital Tula
- Sedentary/agrarian peoples with militaristic ethic
- Cult of sacrifice/war
- Aztecs saw Toltecs as givers of civilization
- Toltecs/Aztecs replace Mayas of 8th century CE
- The Toltec Heritage
- Leader Topilitzin followed Quetzalcoatl – feathered serpent
- Empire spread over much of central Mexico
- 1000 Conquered Chichen Itza – Mayans under control of Toltecs
- Toltec influence northward
- Trade turquoise with American Southwest
- How far – to Mississippi/Ohio – debatable evidence
- Stepped temples – Monk’s Mound
- Ritual sacrifice
- pottery
- Social stratification
- Large city – Cahokia could handle 30,000 people
- The Aztec Rise to Power – eagle with serpent on cactus
- Geography – aquatic environment – chinampas
- Aztecs/Mexicas won control of lake
- Nomadic tribes or agricultural culture
- Political structure – centralized city with tributary city-states
- Military – tough warriors/fanatic followers of religion
- 1428 emerged as independent power
- Geography – aquatic environment – chinampas
- The Aztec Social Contract
- Subject peoples
- Pay tribute, surrender lands, military service
- King civil power/god on earth
- Stratified society
- Histories rewritten
- Human sacrifice – cult of military class supplying war captives as sacrifices
- Subject peoples
- Religion and the Ideology of Conquest
- Incorporated features from past Mesoamerican religions
- Little distinction between world of gods and natural world
- Deities – fire, rain, water, corn, sky, sun – pantheon
- Gods of fertility/agriculture
- Creator deities
- Warfare and sacrifice
- Female form for all gods
- Yearly festivals/ceremonies
- Expansive calendar
- Sacrifice - to energize the sun god – needed nourishment of human blood
- Types and frequency/degree changed with Aztecs – borrowed from Toltec
- religious conviction vs. political control
- Religious questions – afterlife, good life, do gods exist
- Art has flowers/birds/song and blood
- Incorporated features from past Mesoamerican religions
- Tenochtitlan: The Foundation of Heaven
- Metropois – central zone of palaces/whitewashed temples
- Adobe brick residential districts
- Larger houses for nobility
- Zoos, gardens for king
- Geographically connected to island by four causeways
- Calpulli ruled neighborhoods
- Feeding the People: The Economy of the Empire
- Mass population needed to be fed
- Tribute
- Irrigated agriculture – chinampas – floating islands
- 20,000 acres
- High crop yields – 4 times a year – corn/maize
- Trade
- Regular intervals to market
- Barter or cacao beans/gold for currency
- Pochteca – long distance trade
- State controlled distribution of tribute
- Primarily redistributed to nobility
- Mass population needed to be fed
- Introduction
- Aztec Society in Transition
- Widening Social Gulf
- Life based on calpulli (neighborhood) groups
- Governed by council of family heads
- Nobility came from heads of calpullis
- Military leaders based on success in taking captives
- Ritual warfare – uniforms
- As society grew, widening social disparity – no longer egalitarian (hmmm…where have I seen this pattern before?)
- Scribes, artisans, healers between peasants and nobility
- But…competition not between social classes, but between corporate groups
- Life based on calpulli (neighborhood) groups
- Overcoming Technological Constraints
- Role of women – relatively equal, but subordinate to men
- Peasant women – fields, child-rearing
- Revered as weavers
- Polygamy among nobility, monogamy among poor
- Could inherit property
- Limits of technology
- Women – six hours a day grinding corn/maize
- Couldn’t be freed from 30-40 hours of preparing food
- Women – six hours a day grinding corn/maize
- Controlled vast number of people amazingly –
- 5 million to 25 million
- Role of women – relatively equal, but subordinate to men
- A Tribute Empire
- Most power in hands of Aztec ruler and chief advisor
- “elected” from best siblings of royal family
- As time passed, ritual sacrifice/military dominated all elements of life
- City-states – as long as they made tribute – they could have autonomy
- Weaknesses
- Rise of nobles altered dynamics
- Society based on system of terror
- By 1500, Aztec society was in the down, military period – height far earlier
- Most power in hands of Aztec ruler and chief advisor
- Widening Social Gulf
- Twantinsuyu: World of the Incas
- Inca Empire – Twantinsuyu – highly centralized
- Integrated various ethnic groups
- Irrigated agriculture
- Incorporated elements of previous civilizations – agriculture/religion/metallurgy
- Introduction
- Genius for state organization/bureaucratic control
- When central authority broke down, regional leaders took over
- war between rival chiefdoms
- The Inca Rise to Power
- Inca “ruler” – military alliances and campaigns to take over
- Subsequent rulers with names you’ll never remember expanded and consolidated land
- Between 9 and 13 million people under rule
- Conquest and Religion
- Reason for conquest
- economic gain
- political power
- religion – cult of ancestors
- deceased rulers mummified
- split inheritance
- leader’s power goes to successor
- leader’s property goes to male family
- political and social life related to religion
- holy shrines – stones, mountains, rivers, caves, tombs – huacas
- Prayers/human sacrifices
- Temple of the Sun – center of state religion
- holy shrines – stones, mountains, rivers, caves, tombs – huacas
- Reason for conquest
- The Techniques of Inca Imperial Rule
- Leader/inca considered a god
- Court also temple
- Four provinces ruled by governor, power then divided further
- Local rulers could remain autonomous if they were loyal
- All nobles played role in state bureaucracy
- Nobles gained privileges, had a lot to lose
- Could wear large ear spools – orejones – gee thanks
- Spread language – unified
- System of roads with way stations – tambos – one day apart
- For labor, people benefited from large, expensive work projects – only central gov’t can provide
- State-sponsored irrigation made cultivation possible
- Instead of tribute, they wanted labor
- Relation between men and wome
- Needed to stay close
- Women link to the moon
- Downfall
- Marriage alliances created rivals for the throne – ahhh…that whole succession problem rears its ugly head
- Inca Cultural Achievements
- Art – built on styles of predecessor peoples
- Metallurgy – gold/silver/bronze, copper
- Pottery/cloth
- But…No system of writing…No wheel
- Math
- Knotted strings quipo to count
- Infrastructure – greatest achievement
- land/water management
- extensive road systems
- Architecture and public buildings
- Terraced farming on steep slopes
- Art – built on styles of predecessor peoples
- Comparing Incas and Aztecs aka “if you forget everything else, remember this”
- But first, before we get started…look at the words used in this section
- No really…look at the words used
- They start with words like “although”, or “both”
- It’s just beautiful how the reader can make connections
- In fact, my eyes are filling a little misty
- This is one of the best Comparative Analysis Essays I’ve ever seen in your Stearns book, and after 14 chapters of taking notes, I’m starting to
- feel like Stearns is like a brother, an older brother, but a brother
- but…I digress…let’s get back to it
- This is one of the best Comparative Analysis Essays I’ve ever seen in your Stearns book, and after 14 chapters of taking notes, I’m starting to
- Similarities
- Represented military and imperial organization success
- Controlled circulation of goods
- Agricultural based with a food surplus
- Nobles became more important than local leaders
- Allowed for diversity as long as authority
- Empires acquired by conquest of sedentary peoples
- Belief systems, cosmology similar roots
- Both couldn’t survive shock of conquest
- Your book says they do survive the conquest, but I beg to differ, they were split up into small little regions
- But, I will accept that they carried on the culture
- However “We cannot overlook the great DIFFERENCES”
- Aztecs have better trade and markets
- First, there quite similar, variations of same system
- Metallurgy, writing systems, hierarchy
- Ummm…book…could you give us some specifics
- Overall…this section does a horrible job discussing differences
- But first, before we get started…look at the words used in this section
- Inca Empire – Twantinsuyu – highly centralized
- Other Indians
- How to differentiate – based on degree of social order/material culture/political structure
- Diversity based on geographical factors
- Not all agriculture based
- How many Indians?
- If you guessed 14,375,421, you were wrong
- Between 8.4 million and 112 million – Gee thanks…that’s real close
- Numbers changed due to
- Understanding of impact of disease
- archaeological studies
- improved estimates of agricultural techniques
- Numbers changed due to
- Europe about the same size as the Americas – population wise
- Differing Cultural Patterns
- Basically…it’s hard to say there is just one type of “Indian”
- Some hunted, some gathered, some farmed, some did a mixture
- Some had huge class divisions, some were more egalitarian
- Most lived in small kin-ship based groups
- North America extremely diverse
- Some lived in cliffs, towns or teepees
- Agricultural unless farming too tough, then hunter gatherers
- Similar to Europe/Asia
- Kin based societies
- Communal owning of property
- Women subordinate, but some had high positions
- Part of ecological system, not controlling it “You think you own whatever land you land on…earth is just a dead thing you can claim, but I know…”
- Basically…it’s hard to say there is just one type of “Indian”
- American Indian Diversity in World Context
- Paradox – wealthy/accomplished civilizations, but “primitive” to Europe
- But…how much is the difference based on lack of…
- wheel
- large pack animals
- metal tools
- written language
- They developed, just differently
- Global Connections
- Isolation prevented diffusion of ideas – it’s not bad, just the reality
- Lacks world religions, large domesticated animals (yes…they had guinea pigs)
- Not immune to diseases
- Lacked ironworking
- I’m tired, and I’m going to bed
- How to differentiate – based on degree of social order/material culture/political structure
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Chapter 11 The Americas on the Eve of Invasion | 46.5 KB |