AP Notes, Outlines, Study Guides, Vocabulary, Practice Exams and more!

AP GOV & POLITICS CASES-TO-KNOW Flashcards

important cases to memorize

Terms : Hide Images
370549350Barron v. Baltimore 1833decision tht limited the applicaiton of the bill of rights to the actions of congress alone
370549351Brown v. Board 1954school segregation in unconstitutional because violates 14th, marked end of legal separation; warren court
370549352Dred Scott v. Sanford 1857us congress lacked constitutional authority to bar slavery, narrowed national power and widened state
370549353Furman v. GA 1972end capital punishment (death penalty), overturned by Gregg v. GA
370549354Gitlow v. NY 1925incorporated free speech clause (1st); states arent completely free to limit forms of political expression
370549355Mcculoch v. Maryland 1819court upheld national power, denied states the right to tax the bank
370549356Plessy v. Ferguson 1896Plessy challenged LA statute requiring separate accommodations on railroads; court found separate but = didnt violate 14th
370549358Chilsolm v. GA 1793court interpreted jurisdiction under article 3 section 2 to include right to hear suits by citizen of state v. state
370549359Marbury v. Madison 1803court 1st asserted power of judicial review** finding a congressional statute extending courts original jurisdiction was unconstitutional
384295424Abbington v. Schemmp 1963prohibited devotional bible reading in public schools by virtue of establishment clause and 14th amendments due process clause. warren courts judicial activism.
384295425Weeks v. US 1914est the exclusionary rule at the federal level; illegally obtained evidence cannot be used in court
384295426Schenck v. US 1919oliver wendell holmes; clear and present danger test; shouting 'fire' in a crowded theater; limits on speech; esp in wartime
384295427Near v. Minnesota 1931held that the 1st amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint
384295428Palko v. Connecticut 1937provided test for determining which parts of the bill of rights should be federalized-those which are implicitly or explicitly necessary for liberty to exist
384295429Korematsu v. US 1944upheld as constitutional the internment of americans with japanese descent during ww2
384295430Roth v. US 1957est that ;obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press'
384295431Mapp v. Ohio 1961est exclusionary rule; illegally obtained evidence cant be used in court; warren court
384295432Engel v. Vitale 1962prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools (1st amendment establishment clause and 14th due process clause); warren court
384295433Baker v. Carr 1962'one man, one vote'; ordered state legislative districts to be as near equal as possible in population; warren court
384295434Gideon v. Wainwright 1963ordered states to provide lawyers for those unable to afford them in criminal proceeding; warren court
384295435Wesberry v. Sanders 1963ordered house districts to be as near equal in population as possible
384295436NY Times v. Sullivan 1964held that statements about public figures are libelous only if made with malice and reckless disregard for the truth
384295437Griswald v. Connecticut 1965est right of privacy through 4th and 9th amendments. set precedent for roe v. wade
384295438Miller v. California 1973est that community standards be used in determining whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to 'prurient interest', being 'patently offensive', and lacking in value
384295439Lemon v. Kurtzman 1971established a 3-part test to determine if est clause is violated: non secular purpose, advances/inhibits religion, excessive entanglement with the government
384295440Miranda v. Arizona 1965established miranda warnings or counsel and silence mist be given before questioning, warren court
384295441Roe v. Wade 1973est national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may REGULATE to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health of unborn child in 3rd. inferred from right of privacy in Griswold v. Connecticut
384295442US v. Nixon 1974allowed for executive privilege, but not in criminal cases; 'even the president is not about the law', watergate
384295443Buckley v. Valeo 19761st amendment protects campaign SPENDING; legislatures cam limit CONTRIBUTIONS, but not how much one spends of his own money on campaigns. opened door for PACs to spend unlimited amount on campaigns so long as they're not directly coordinated with a particular campaign
384295444Gregg v. GA 1976upheld constitutionality of death penalty; not cruel and unusual punishment; overturned by Furman v. GA
384295445UC Regents v. Bakke 1978Bakke & UC Davis Med School; declared strict quotas unconstitutional but states may allow race to be taken into account as ONE factor in admissions decisions.Bakke was admitted; affirmative action
384295446Texas v. Johnson 1989struck down a law banning the burning of the american flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by 1st
384295447Planned Parenthood v. Casey 1992states can regulate abortion, but not with regulations that impose 'undue burden' upon women; did not overturn Roe, but gave state more leeway in regulating abortion
384295448Shaw v. Reno 1993no racial gerrymandering; face cannot be the Sole or Predominant factor in redrawing legislative boundaries; majority-minority districts
384295449US v. Lopez 1995gun free school zones act exceed congress' authority to regulate interstate commerce. the first case to begin reigning in congress' authority under commerce clause
384295450Clinton v. NY 1998banned presidential use of line-item veto
384295451Bush v. Gore 2000use of 14th's equal protection clause to stop the florida recount in 2000 election
384295452Zelman v. Simmons-Harris 2002public money can be used to send disadvantaged children to religious schools in tuition voucher programs
384295453Ashcroft v. ACLU 2002struck down a federal ban on 'virtual' child pornograpgy
384295454Lawrence v. Texas 2003using right of privacy, struck down Texas law banning sodomy
384295455Gratz v. Bollinger 2003struck down use of 'bonus points' for race in undergrad admissions at U of Michigan; affirmative action
384295456Grutter v. Bollinger 2003allowed the use of race as a general factor in law school admissions at U of Michigan; affirmative action

Need Help?

We hope your visit has been a productive one. If you're having any problems, or would like to give some feedback, we'd love to hear from you.

For general help, questions, and suggestions, try our dedicated support forums.

If you need to contact the Course-Notes.Org web experience team, please use our contact form.

Need Notes?

While we strive to provide the most comprehensive notes for as many high school textbooks as possible, there are certainly going to be some that we miss. Drop us a note and let us know which textbooks you need. Be sure to include which edition of the textbook you are using! If we see enough demand, we'll do whatever we can to get those notes up on the site for you!