AP Notes, Outlines, Study Guides, Vocabulary, Practice Exams and more!

AP Government: Supreme Court Cases

Terms : Hide Images
167472775Baker v. Carr(1962) Guaranty Clause does not prevent courts from having the right to determine whether state legislative apportionment violates citizens' 14th A. rights
167472776Barron v. Baltimore(1883) Bill of Rights does not apply to the states
167472777Bob Jones University v. US(1983) The government's fundamental, overriding interest in eradicating racial discrimination in education substantially outweighs whatever burden denial of tax benefits places on the exercise of religious beliefs (the university was denied tax-exempt status because it discriminates racially)
167472778Brandenburg v. Ohio(1969) Speech that does not call for illegal action is protected, and even speech that does call for illegal action is protected if the action is not "imminent" or there is reason to believe that the listeners will not take action.
167472779Brown v. Board of Education(1954, 1955) Overturned Plessy case. Racially segregated public facilities are unconstitutional.
167472780Buckley v. Valeo(1976) Upheld FECA's limitations placed on campaign contributions but protected independent political expenditures as free speech.
167472781Clinton v. City of New York(1998) Line Item veto declared unconstitutional on the grounds that it gave legislative power to the president.
167472782Engle v. Vitale(1962) Prayer in public schools prohibited by First Amendment (which was made applicable to the states under the 14th A.)
167472783Escovedo v. Illinois(1964) Exclusionary rule case. Courts can't use evidence obtained from a suspect who has been denied opportunity to consult with counsel and has not been warned of his constitutional right to keep silent, because his 5th, 6th, and 14th A. rights have been violated.
167472784Gibbons v. Ogden(1824) Steamboats on the Hudson River. The Constitution gives the Federal government power to regulate commerce. Opened door to the use of commerce clause to control states.
167472785Gideon v. Wainwright(1963) The state's refusal to appoint counsel for an indigent accused of non-capital felony violated due process clause.
167472786Gitlow v. New York(1925) Supreme Court held that freedom of speech and of the press were among the "fundamental personal rights" protected by the due-process clause of the 14th A. from infringements by state (as well as federal) action. this case allowed the incorporation of the Bill of Rights to apply to state government as well as the national government.
167472787Griswold v. Connecticut(1965) A Connecticut statute forbidding use of contraceptives violates the right of marital privacy which is within the penumbra of specific guarantees of the Bill of Rights.
167472788Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier(1988) Freedom of the press is different for students. Principals can censor school newspapers.
167472789Heart of Atlanta Motel v. US(1964) Congress has the right to prohibit racial discrimination in places of public accommodation through the Commerce Clause because the interstate because the interstate movement of people is "commerce." Even if the public accommodation is of a purely "local" character, Congress' power to regulate interstate commerce extends to local incidents thereof which might have a substantial and harmful effect on the commerce.
167914408INS v. Chadha(1983) The legislative veto is unconstitutional.
167914409Korematsu v. US(1944) California was right to intern Japanese-American in camps during crisis of WWII.
167914410Lau v. Nichols(1974) The failure of San Francisco schools to provide English-language instruction to approximately 1,800 students of Chinese ancestry who do not speak English, or to provide them with other adequate instructional procedures, denies them a meaningful opportunity to participate in the public education program, and thus violates the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the 14th A.
167914411Lemon v. Kurtzman(1971) Concerns aid to sectarian schools; Lemon test created to interpret the establishment clause.
167914412Mapp v. Ohio(1961) Began exclusionary rule. Courts cannot use evidence attained by police illegally.
167914413Marbury v. Madison(1803) Established the "very essence of judicial duty" in deciding what laws conform to the Constitution - judicial review
167914414McCulloch v. Maryland(1819) US Constitution is "the supreme law of the land." This case began the process of expanding the power of the federal government through the necessary and proper clause. (Implied powers; since Congress has the power to tax and spend, the creation of a nation bank is implied [necessary and proper] to that end).
167914415Miranda v. Arizona(1966) Criminal suspect's rights include being informed of rights to counsel and to remain silent.
167914416Miller v. California(1973) A first amendment case. The Court defined obscenity. To be obscene, the work, taken as a whole, must be judged by "the average person applying contemporary community standards" to appeal to the "prurient interest" or to depict "in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable state law" and to lack "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value"
167914417Miller v. Johnson(1995) States cannot draw congressional districts in which race is the primary consideration.
167914418Near v. Minnesota(1931) Court would not allow prior restraint on the press.
167914419New York Times v. Sullivan(1964) A state cannot, under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, award [libel] damages to a public official for defamatory falsehood relating to his official conduct unless he proves "actual malice" - that the statement was made with knowledge of its falsity or with reckless disregard of whether it was true or false.
167914420New York Times Co. v. US(1971) "Pentagon Papers" case decided Nixon's attempted "prior restraint" was unconstitutional interference with press freedom.
167914421Plessy v. Ferguson(1896) Upheld racial discrimination: "separate but equal"
167914422Roe v. Wade(1973) Certain state criminal abortion laws involve the Due Process clause of the 14th Amendment, which protects against state action the (implied) right to privacy in the Bill of Rights.
167914423Roth v. US(1957) Obscene material is not protected by the First Amendment.
167914424San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez(1972) Education is not within the limited category of rights recognized by the Supreme Court as guaranteed by the Constitution.
167914425Shaw v. Reno(1993) North Carolina congressional district 12 was an unacceptable form of racial gerrymandering. This ruling was better defined in Miller v. Johnson.
167914426Schenck v. US(1919) The Supreme Court (in a unanimous opinion by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes) announced the "clear and present danger" test. Whether or not the words used or expressed by an individual are of such nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent (not shouting fire in a movie theatre)
167914427Texas v. Johnson(1989) Flag burning case. State statutes against flag desecration are unconstitutional limits on freedom of speech. Symbolic speech is protected by the Constitution.
167914428Tinker v. Des Moines School District(1969) Freedom of speech held to include students wearing black armbands at school to protest the Vietnam War
167914429US v. Nixon(1974) Limited executive privilege. Nixon has to turn over personal tapes relating to Watergate case. The president's confidentiality was subordinate to due process of law and the administration of criminal justice.

Need Help?

We hope your visit has been a productive one. If you're having any problems, or would like to give some feedback, we'd love to hear from you.

For general help, questions, and suggestions, try our dedicated support forums.

If you need to contact the Course-Notes.Org web experience team, please use our contact form.

Need Notes?

While we strive to provide the most comprehensive notes for as many high school textbooks as possible, there are certainly going to be some that we miss. Drop us a note and let us know which textbooks you need. Be sure to include which edition of the textbook you are using! If we see enough demand, we'll do whatever we can to get those notes up on the site for you!