AP Notes, Outlines, Study Guides, Vocabulary, Practice Exams and more!

AP US Government Chapter 4 Vocab

Terms : Hide Images
56586377civil libertiesThe legal constitutional protections against government. Although our civil liberties are formally set down in the Bill of Rights, the courts, police, and legislatures define their meaning.
56586378Bill of RightsThe first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which defines such basic liberties as freedom of religion, speech, and press and guarantee defendants' rights.
56586379First AmendmentThe constitutional amendment that establishes the four great liberties: freedom of the press, of speech, of religion, and of assembly.
56586380Barron v. BaltimoreThe 1833 Supreme Court decision holding that the Bill of Rights restrained only the national government, not the states and cities.
56586381Gitlow v. New YorkThe 1926 Supreme Court decision holding that freedoms of press and speech were "fundamental personal rights and liberties protected by the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment from impairment by the states" as well as by the federal government. Compare Barron v. Baltimore.
56586382Fourteenth AmendmentThe constitutional amendment adopted after the Civil War that states, "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any citizen of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny any person within its jurisdiction equal protection of the laws," see also due process clause.
56586383due process clausePart of the Fourteenth Amendment guaranteeing that persons cannot be deprived of life, liberty, or property by the United States or state governments without due process of law. See also Gitlow v. New York.
56586384incorporation doctrineThe legal concept under which the Supreme Court has nationalized the Bill of Rights by making most of its provisions applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
56586385establishment clausePart of the First Amendment stating that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion."
56586386free exercise clauseA First Amendment provision that prohibits government from interfering with the practice of religion.
56586387Lemon v. KurtzmanThe 1971 Supreme Court decision that established that aid to church-related schools must (1) have a secular legislative purpose; (2) have a primary effect that neither advances nor inhibits religion; and (3) not foster excessive government entanglement with religion.
56586388Zelman v. Simmons-HarrisThe 2002 Supreme Court decision that upheld a state providing families with vouchers that could be used to pay for tuition at religious schools.
56586389Engel v. VitaleThe 1962 Supreme Court decision holding that state officials violated the First Amendment when they wrote a prayer to be recited by New York's schoolchildren.
56586390School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania v. SchuppA 1963 ruling holding that a Pennsylvania law requiring Bible reading in schools violated the establishment clause of the First Amendment.
56586391prior restraintA government preventing material from being published. This is a common method of limiting the press in some nations, but is usually unconstitutional in the United States, according to the First Amendment and as confirmed in the 1931 Supreme Court case of Near v. Minnesota.
56586392Near v. MinnesotaThe Supreme Court decision holding that the First Amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.
56586393Schenck v. United StatesA 1919 decision upholding the conviction of a social who had urged young men to resist the draft during World War I. Justice Holmes declared that government can limit the speech if the speech provokes a "clear and present danger" of substantive evils.
56586394Zurcher v. Stanford DailyA 1978 Supreme Court decision holding that a proper search warrant could be applied to a newspaper as well as to anyone else without necessarily violating the First Amendment rights to freedom of the press.
56586395Roth v. United StatesA 1957 Supreme Court decision ruling that "obscenity" is not within the area of constitutionality protected speech or press.
56586396Miller v. CaliforniaA 1973 Supreme Court decision that avoided defining obscenity avoided defining obscenity by holding the community standards be used to determine whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a "prurient interest" and being "patently offensive" and lacking in value.
56586397libelThe publication of false or malicious statements that damage someone's reputation.
56586398New York Times v. SullivanDecided in 1964, this case established the guidelines for determining whether public officials and public figures could win damage suits for libel. To do so, the individuals must prove that for the defamatory statements were made with "actual malice" and reckless disregard for the truth.
56586399Texas v. JohnsonA 1989 case in which the Supreme Court struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment.
56586400symbolic speechNonverbal communication, such as burning a flag or wearing an armband. The Supreme Court has accorded some symbolic free speech protection under the First Amendment.
56586401commercial speechCommunication in the form of advertising. It can be restricted more than any other types of types of speech but has been receiving increased protection from the Supreme Court.
56586402Miami Herald Publishing Company v. TornilloA 1974 case in which the Supreme Court held that a state could not force a newspaper to print replies from candidates it had criticized, illustrating the limited powers of government to restrict the media.
56586403Red Lion Broadcasting Company v. Federal Communications CommissionA 1969 case in which the Supreme Court upheld restrictions on radio and television broadcasting. These restrictions on the broadcast media are much tighter than those of print media are only a limited number of broadcasting frequencies available.
56586404NAACP v. AlabamaThe Supreme Court protected the right to assemble peaceably in this 1958 case when it decided the NAACP did not have to reveal its membership list and that subject its members to harassment.
56586405probable causeThe situation occurring when the police have reason to believe that a person should be arrested. In making the arrest, people are allowed legally to search for and seize incriminating evidence.
56586406unreasonable searches and seizuresObtaining evidence in a haphazard or random manner, a practice prohibited by the Fourth Amendment. Probably cause and /or search warrant are required for a legal and proper search and what police are searching for.
56586407Exclusionary RuleThe rule that evidence, no matter how incriminating, cannot be introduced into a trial if it was not constitutionally obtained. The rule prohibits use of evidence obtained likewise though
56586408Mapp v. OhioThe 1961 Supreme Court decision ruling that the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable search and seizures must be extended to the states as well as to the federal government.
56586409Fifth AmendmentA constitutional amendment designed to protect the rights of persons accused of crimes, including protection against double jeopardy, self-incrimination, and punishment without due process of law.
56586410self-incriminationThe situation occurring when an individual accused of a crime is compelled to be a witness against himself or herself in court. The Fifth Amendment forbids self-incrimination.
56586411Miranda v. ArizonaThe 1966 Supreme Court decision that sets guidelines for police question of accused persons to protect them against self-incrimination and to protect their right to counsel.
56586412Sixth AmendmentA constitutional amendment designed to protect individuals accused of crimes. It includes the right to counsel, the right to confront witnesses, and the right to do a speedy and public trial.
56586413Gibbons v. WainwrightThe 1963 Supreme Court decision holding that anyone accused of a felony where imprisonment may be imposed, however poor he or she might be, has a right to a lawyer. See also Sixth Amendment.
56586414plea bargainingA bargain struck between the defendant's lawyer and the prosecutor to the effect that the defendant will plead guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer crimes) in exchange for the state's promise not to prosecute the defendant for a more serious (or additional) crime.
56586415Eighth AmendmentThe constitutional amendment that forbids cruel and unusual punishment, although it does not define this phrase. Through the Fourteenth Amendment, this Bill of Rights provisions applies to the states.
56586416cruel and unusual punishmentCourt sentences prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. Although the Supreme Court has ruled that mandatory death sentences for certain offenses that are unconstitutional, it has not held that the death penalty itself constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.
56586417Gregg v. GeorgiaThe 1976 Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty, stating, "It is an extreme sanction, suitable to the most extreme of crimes." The court did not, therefore, believe that the death sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.
56586418McCleskey v. KempThe 1987 Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty against charges that it violated the Fourteenth Amendment because minority defendants were more likely to receive the death penalty than were white defendants.
56586419right to privacyThe right to a private personal life free from the intrusion of government
56586420Roe v. WadeThe 1973 Supreme Court decision holding that a state ban on all abortions was unconstitutional. The decision forbade state control over abortions during the first trimester, permitted states to limit abortions to protect the mother's health in the second trimester of pregnancy, and permitted states to protect the mother's health in the third trimester.
56586421Planned Pregnancy v. CaseyA 1992 case in which the Supreme Court loosened its restrictions on abortion from one of "strict scrutiny" of any restraints to on a "fundamental right" to one of "undue burden. That permits considerably more regulation.

Need Help?

We hope your visit has been a productive one. If you're having any problems, or would like to give some feedback, we'd love to hear from you.

For general help, questions, and suggestions, try our dedicated support forums.

If you need to contact the Course-Notes.Org web experience team, please use our contact form.

Need Notes?

While we strive to provide the most comprehensive notes for as many high school textbooks as possible, there are certainly going to be some that we miss. Drop us a note and let us know which textbooks you need. Be sure to include which edition of the textbook you are using! If we see enough demand, we'll do whatever we can to get those notes up on the site for you!