Terms : Hide Images
| 13445796284 | Which case regards the when there shouldn't be lifting of the corporate veil? | Salomon v Salomon (1896) | 0 | |
| 13445815439 | Which 2 cases support the findings of Salomon v Salomon? | 1. Macaura v Northern Assurance Co (1925) 2. Lee v Lee's Air Farming (1961) | 1 | |
| 13445831176 | Which 2 cases define the idea that "wholly owned subsidiaries have separate legal personality"? | 1. Gramophone and Typewrite Co Ltd v Stanley (1908) 2. Lonrho v Shell (1980) | 2 | |
| 13445863644 | Which 3 cases cover the "Attributing of traits to a corporation"? | 1. Lennard's Carrying Co v Asiatic Petroleum (1915) 2. R v ICR Haulage (1944) 3. DPP v Kent and Sussex (1944) | 3 | |
| 13445877380 | Which 2 cases cover the "Directing Mind and Will"? | 1. Tesco Supermarkets v Nattrass (1972) 2. El Anjou v Dollar Land Holdings (1994) | 4 | |
| 13445888782 | Which 2 cases outline when the corporate veil will be lifted? | 1. Creasey v Brechwood Motors (1993) 2. Ord v Belhaven Pubs Ltd (1998) | 5 | |
| 13445898494 | Which case sets out the categories for lifting the veil? | Adams v Cape Industries (1990) | 6 | |
| 13445907038 | What are the 3 categories that justify lifting the veil? | 1. Interpretation of a statute or document (DHN Food Distribution Ltd v Tower Hamlets (1976)) 2. Where the company is being used as a sham/facade (Jones v Lipman (1962)) 3. Where there is the existence of an agent/principal relationship | 7 | |
| 13445936907 | Which 3 cases govern tortious liability veil lifting? | 1. Williams v Natural Life (1998) 2. Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping (2003) 3. Lubbe v Cape Industries (2000) | 8 |
