AP Notes, Outlines, Study Guides, Vocabulary, Practice Exams and more!

erotic flashcards

Terms : Hide Images
sexually explicit speech is not protected by the First Amendment
does not have legal definition and is a catchall term used in non-legal speech
material that may be sexually graphic; often referred to as adult material or sexually explicit material
a narrow class of material defined by the Supreme Court in the Miller test. Sometimes referred to as hard-core pornography.
a work is obscene if it has a tendency to deprave and corrupt those whose minds are open to such immoral influences and into whose hands it might fall. If it might influence the mind of a child, it was obscene for everyone.
1957
1. the dominant theme of the material taken as a whole must appeal to prurient interest in sex 2. a court must find tha the material is patently offensive because it affront contemporary community standards relating to the description or representation of sexual matters 3. it must be utterly without redeeming social value
1973, resulted in the Miller Test
1. an average person, applying contemporary local community standards finds that the work appeals to prurient interest in sex 2. the work depicts in a patently offensive way sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable state law 3. the work in question lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value
shameful or morbid inteerest in nudity, sex or excretion
exclusively with sexually oriented content, not violent stories or images
state standards, all communities within the same state share the same standards
representations or discriptions of ultimate sexual acts, normal or perverted, actual or similated, and representations or descriptions of masturbation, excretory functions, and lewd exhibitions of genitals
The test is not if a reasonable person from the community can find value, but if a person COULD find value in an "obscene" material
means that states can have two standards for the obscene, one for adults and one for minors under 18 years old. Cannot interfere with the flow of information to adults
struck down because it banned the idea of child pornography, the statute prohibited the depiction or advertisement which might suggest that children had produced the material
banned material that reflects the belief or inteded others to believe that the material contains illicit child porography
The state said that before a person can be convicted of selling obscene material the person had to be aware of the content they were selling.
it is still illegal to send obscentiy through the mail regardless of how it is delivered
largely outdated today because 1) adult theatres have become virtually extinct 2) most commercial theatres don't show movies rated NC-17 Motion pictures were not granted full First Amendment protection until 1952
1. zoning regulations 2. expressive content regulations
1)serve a substantial state interest 2) does not completely ban all SOBs in the municipality and unreasonably limit alternative avenues of communications
1. minimum distance requirements between dancers and patrons 2. stage height requirements 3. railing requirements around stages 4. rules against direct tipping 5. minimum levels of lighting 6. rules prohibiting doors and partitions on booths and VIP rooms these rules attempt to address secondary effects of SOBs
Entertainment Software Rating Board- the gaming companies rating system on indecent material
made it a crime to transmit indecent material or sallow indecent material to be transmitted over public computer networks to which minors have access
the US Supreme Court held unconstitutional the CDA's provsion protecting minors from "indecent" or "patently offensive" material calling it overbroad
COPA made it as crime to knowingly transmit indecent material to minors over the internet. Harmful material was defined as material that, with respect to minor, is specifically created to appeal to prurient interests, that graphically depicts lewd or sexually explicit behavior, and that lacks serious literary artictic or scientific value
COPA was struck down for being too broad, Justice Kennedy wrote that some internet filters for children are less broad
The Supreme Court upheld this law, which says that if libraries want to continue to recieve federal funding they must install filters on the computers that children are allowed to use.

Need Help?

We hope your visit has been a productive one. If you're having any problems, or would like to give some feedback, we'd love to hear from you.

For general help, questions, and suggestions, try our dedicated support forums.

If you need to contact the Course-Notes.Org web experience team, please use our contact form.

Need Notes?

While we strive to provide the most comprehensive notes for as many high school textbooks as possible, there are certainly going to be some that we miss. Drop us a note and let us know which textbooks you need. Be sure to include which edition of the textbook you are using! If we see enough demand, we'll do whatever we can to get those notes up on the site for you!