I already saw that someone asked about the 1991 DBQ which was:
It was the strength of the opposition forces, both liberal and conservative, rather than the ineptitude and stubbornness of President Wilson that led to the Senate defeat of the Treaty of Versailles.
I just want some peoples' opinions on what side they would choose, I can't make up my mind which I want to choose because I have a lot of info to back up both sides. There are nine documents to this DBQ and 5 of them support Wilson's peskiness and the other 4 support the Senate's inability to come to a consensus. Is it allowed to support both, saying that the Senate thought it through and came to the conclusion that it was a bad idea and at the same time Wilson was being a pest? Thanks!
In a DBQ you are allowed to take both posistions as long as you state it in the thesis and then proceed to support WHY.
You can say pretty much anything in your thesis as long as you can support it.
[URL=http://www.course-notes.org/forum/showthread.php?p=25347#post25347]
These are the Forum Rules,
mak
Okay thanks a bunch! :)