11501596349 | argument | A process of reasoned inquiry; a persuasive discourse resulting in a coherent and considered movement from a claim to a conclusion. | 0 | |
11501685977 | assumption, warrant | In the Toulmin model, this term expresses the assumption necessarily shared by the speaker and the audience. | 1 | |
11501737133 | backing | In the Toulmin model, this term consists of further assurances or data without which the assumption lacks authority. | 2 | |
11501744918 | begging the question | A fallacy in which a claim is based on evidence or support that is in doubt. | 3 | |
11501750396 | circular reasoning | a fallacy in which the writer repeats the claim as a way to provide evidence | 4 | |
11501755402 | claim | Also called an assertion or a proposition, this term states the argument's main idea or position. A claim differs from a topic or subject in that a claim has to be arguable. | 5 | |
11501781729 | claim of fact | This type of claim asserts that something is true or not true. | 6 | |
11501792473 | claim of policy | This type of claim proposes a change. | 7 | |
11501798314 | claim of value | This type of claim argues that something is good or bad, right or wrong. | 8 | |
11501804521 | classic oration | a five-point argument structure that includes introduction, narration, confirmation, refutation, and conclusion. | 9 | |
11501814563 | closed thesis | A thesis statement of the main idea of the argument that also previews the major points the writer intends to make. | 10 | |
11501817785 | deduction | A logical process whereby one reaches a conclusion by starting with a general principle or universal truth (a major premise( and applying it to a specific case (a minor premise). | 11 | |
11501832260 | either/or | A fallacy in which the speaker presents two extreme options as the only possible choices. | 12 | |
11501844332 | faulty analogy | a fallacy that occurs when an analogy compares two things that are not comparable | 13 | |
11501876878 | first-hand evidence | Evidence based on something the writer knows, whether it's from personal experience, observations, or general knowledge of events. | 14 | |
11501884893 | hasty generalization | A fallacy in which a faulty conclusion is reached because of inadequate evidence. | 15 | |
11501891048 | induction | a logical process whereby the writer reasons from particulars to universals, using specific cases in order to draw a conclusion, which is also called a generalization | 16 | |
11501915872 | logical fallacy | potential vulnerabilities or weaknesses in an argument | 17 | |
11501920402 | open thesis | A thesis that does not list all the points the writer intends to cover in an essay. | 18 | |
11501929796 | post hoc ergo propter hoc | This fallacy is Latin for "after which therefore because of which," meaning that it is incorrect to always claim that something is a cause just because it happened earlier. One may loosely summarize this fallacy by saying that correlation does not imply causation. | 19 | |
11501936078 | qualifier | In the Toulmin model, this term uses words like usually, probably, maybe, in most cases, and most likely to temper the claim, making it less absolute. | 20 | |
11501943970 | quantitative evidence | includes things that can be measured, cited, counted, or otherwise represented in numbers | 21 | |
11501952841 | rebuttal | in the Toulmin model, this term gives voice to possible objections | 22 | |
11501970084 | reservation | explains the terms and conditions necessitated by the qualifier | 23 | |
11501990310 | Rogerian arguments | Developed by psychiatrist Carl Rogers, these arguments are based on the assumption that having a full understanding of an opposing position is essential to responding to it persuasively and refuting it in a way that is accommodating rather than alienating. | 24 | |
11501996785 | second-hand evidence | Evidence that is accessed through research, reading, and investigation. It includes factual and historical information, expert opinion, and quantitative data. | 25 | |
11502001743 | straw man | A fallacy that occurs when a speaker chooses a deliberately poor or oversimplified example in order to ridicule and refute an idea. | 26 | |
11502010838 | syllogism | a logical structure that uses the major premise and minor premise to reach a necessary conclusion | 27 | |
11502019731 | Toulmin Model | An approach to analyzing and constructing arguments created by British philosopher Stephen Toulmin. | 28 | |
11502144054 | bandwagon appeal | This fallacy occurs when evidence boils down to "everybody's doing it, so it must be a good thing to do." | 29 |
AP Language Chapter 3 Flashcards
Primary tabs
Need Help?
We hope your visit has been a productive one. If you're having any problems, or would like to give some feedback, we'd love to hear from you.
For general help, questions, and suggestions, try our dedicated support forums.
If you need to contact the Course-Notes.Org web experience team, please use our contact form.
Need Notes?
While we strive to provide the most comprehensive notes for as many high school textbooks as possible, there are certainly going to be some that we miss. Drop us a note and let us know which textbooks you need. Be sure to include which edition of the textbook you are using! If we see enough demand, we'll do whatever we can to get those notes up on the site for you!