Terms : Hide Images
| 8050886132 | Ethos | Ethical appeal, to convince the audience of the author's credibility or character. | 0 | |
| 8050886133 | Pathos (emotion) | The emotional appeal to an audience in an argument. | 1 | |
| 8050886134 | Logos (logical appeal) | a way of persuading an audience through reasoning by offering them facts, statistics, and examples. | 2 | |
| 8050886135 | What is the s stand for in soapstone? | Speaker | 3 | |
| 8050886136 | What does o stand for in soapstone? | Occasion | 4 | |
| 8050886137 | What does a stand for in soapstone? | Audience | 5 | |
| 8050886138 | What does the p stand for in soapstone | Purpose | 6 | |
| 8050886139 | What does the second s in soapstone stand for? | Subject | 7 | |
| 8050886140 | What does the t stand for in soapstone | Tone | 8 | |
| 8050886141 | Rhetoric | The art of using language effectively and persuasively | 9 | |
| 8050886142 | claim of facts | concerning what is or is not true | 10 | |
| 8050886143 | Claim of value means? | What something is worth or morality | 11 | |
| 8050886144 | Claim of policy means? | Answers the question - What should be done? | 12 | |
| 8050886145 | red herring fallacy | irrelevant information is used to divert the direction of the argument | 13 | |
| 8050886146 | ad hominem fallacy | when speakers attack the person making the argument and not the argument itself | 14 | |
| 8050886147 | false dilemma fallacy | if you claim that there are only two possible choices to address a problem | 15 | |
| 8050886148 | Strawman Fallacy | Misrepresenting someone's argument to make it easier to attack | 16 | |
| 8050886149 | hasty generalization fallacy | error of drawing a conclusion on the basis of insufficient evidence | 17 | |
| 8050886150 | Circular reasoning | Reasoning that ends and begins in the same place. No evidence is offered | 18 | |
| 8050886151 | post hoc ergo propter hoc | Mistaken notion that one thing happens after another, the first event was a cause of the second event | 19 | |
| 8050886152 | False authority | Claiming something is tue because it is lived by someone who said is to be an "authority" on the subject | 20 | |
| 8050886153 | Bandwagon | Knowing you could be rejected by peers for decision | 21 | |
| 8050886154 | inductive reasoning | The bottom up approach, requires more see fix observation to generalizations and theories | 22 | |
| 8050886155 | deductive reasoning | Is always certain and complete, top to down approach | 23 | |
| 8050886156 | Toulmin Model | An approach to analyzing and constructing arguments created by British philosopher Stephen Toulmin. | 24 | |
| 8050886157 | What are the parts of a toulmin model? | Evidence, assumption, qualifier, reservation, claim | 25 | |
| 8050886158 | Toulmin model set up? | Because (evidence as support), therefore (claim), since (assumption), on account (backing), unless (reservation) | 26 | |
| 8050886159 | Data | Facts, figures, and other evidence gathered through observations. | 27 | |
| 8050886160 | claims | Statement being argued | 28 | |
| 8050886161 | Warrants | The General, hypothetical, local statements, that serves as a bridge between the claim and data, makes a qualifier (similar to the qualifier) | 29 | |
| 8050886162 | Qualifiers | Statements that limit the strength of the argument that propose the conditions under which the argument is true | 30 | |
| 8050886163 | Rebuttals | Counter arguments (unless it has a hole in it) rain reference | 31 | |
| 8050886164 | Backing statements | Statements that serve to support the warrants, supports assumption | 32 |
