Need Help?
We hope your visit has been a productive one. If you're having any problems, or would like to give some feedback, we'd love to hear from you.
For general help, questions, and suggestions, try our dedicated support forums.
If you need to contact the Course-Notes.Org web experience team, please use our contact form.
Need Notes?
While we strive to provide the most comprehensive notes for as many high school textbooks as possible, there are certainly going to be some that we miss. Drop us a note and let us know which textbooks you need. Be sure to include which edition of the textbook you are using! If we see enough demand, we'll do whatever we can to get those notes up on the site for you!
Greenlover17;80805 wrote:Marine Corps,
Explain please.
Greenlover17
ok say for instance a walmart wants to go and buy out your farm, where you grow tobacco, to build a store, the federal government (this is all depending on what you grow) will recieve more money via federal taxes on the products that the walmart sells, thereby making more money as a whole for higher budgets, etc. so the government will play the entire "eminent domain" card and say that its for the public as opposed to an individual and they will force you to sell your land. now this may seem like a "need of the many outweighs the need of the few" scenario but if you look into it at all then you will see that it truley is a "want of the powerful outweighs the need of the few". chances are that the farmers family has been there for a while and they had all of their crops planted and everything figured out, but then a walmart, posing to make the federal government more money, comes in and sees the location of the farm and decides it would be the best for business. the walmart can just as easily build elsewhere but the farmer cant simply uproot and have everything as good as it was before. the farmer would take a major hit just so the powerful can have what they want. same goes for cannibalism, if a cannibal were to come to america from another country and his religion practiced cannibalism, and he was the CEO of a major import/export organization the brought the federal government tons of money, they would grant them political immunity, meaning they can kill and eat whomever they want simply because they are rich. in their country they would be "tried" for the murder but since they are rich and influential they would probably never even see court...
does that help a little?
How could one such as myself answer such a question without so much as a second glance?
Marine Corps
That, is so messed up.
Greenlover17
Just Breathe...
A relationship is like a shark; it needs a constant current, or it stops living.
Curiouser and curiouser. ~ Alice, from Lewis Carroll's Alice's Adventures in Wonderland
Rainfall may make
Greenlover17;80920 wrote:Marine Corps
That, is so messed up.
Greenlover17
??? how so?
How could one such as myself answer such a question without so much as a second glance?
wew, I do not think intelligent design should be taught in non-secular schools, only in secular schools. Intelligent design has no business being taught is non-secular schools at all as it is not a proven "subject" much less a science. If parents really want their children to learn about it, they should send their students to a secular school where intelligent design can be taugh at free will. If students in a non-secular school wish to learn in, then make a religion class that deals with intelligent design, don't try to teach it as a science or part of another class.
At the end of the day, it is up to the students if they want to take the class or not, because if schools do offer it as part of their curriculum they CANNOT, by law, make it a required class, unless it's a secular school and you have previously agreed to it.
[URL=http://goodmorning-news.co.cc]top news[/URL]
[URL=http://headlinenewstoday.co.cc]headline news today[/URL]
[url]http://headlinenewstoday.co.cc/article/dave-s-sports-shop-lynden-wa.html...
I think you have the definition of secular backwards. Non-secular would be considered "Religious." And vice versa.
Pages